
Although coaching can seem like a specialism, requiring professional qualifications, it is within the reach of most people to grow their own ability towards developing others via coaching. The role of a coach is to encourage the coachee to come up with their own suggestions and decisions, and to support removing any obstacles to their growth and development. Many of the qualities and behaviours that a coach requires are achievable, and research suggests these should include:
Most people with some experience of working with others already have many of these skills and qualities. Others can be developed with a little bit of patience and practice (e.g., actively listening, demonstrating empathy). However, the best way to use these skills is to use a structured coaching model, such as the OSCAR model, to help the flow of coaching conversations.
The OSCAR coaching model was originally designed by Whittleworth and Gilbert in 2002, with the aim of building on the 1990s GROW coaching model, focusing on solutions rather than problems. The OSCAR model proposes that if the five elements in the table below are understood and applied by the coach then the long-term result of the coaching relationship will achieve the desired ‘outcome’.
This model is invaluable for any personal development situation, but as it provides a framework based on reaching action milestones, it may be most suitable for coaching on a longer-term outcome (e.g., wanting to develop skills as a project team leader). The desired goal may have originated in a review meeting or feedback session, but coaching has been shown to be most effective if run as separate sessions, at times when both coach and coachee can be present in both mind and body.
The coach and the coachee start by discussing the issue/situation/goal, as well as establishing a contract and transparent coaching process. There must be a clear and identifiable issue to be coached on, which the coachee agrees they wish to move forwards with.
The questions in each section below help focus the coachee on finding solutions. Not all of them will be needed in the first coaching session and could be used in further review sessions (as below).
(The Destination)
The coach helps the coachee to clarify the outcomes (for the session and longer-term) around issues raised
Short term (for this session):
Long Term (around the situation):
(The starting point)
The coach helps the coachee to gain clarity around where they are right now and raises awareness of the situation, their feelings and how impacting on their life and those of their peers
Situation:
(The route options)
The coach helps the coachee generate as many alternative courses of action as possible, and increases awareness about the consequences of each choice
Choices and Consequences:
(The detailed plan)
The coach helps the coachee review options generated and clarify steps forward, plus take responsibility for own action plan (using SMART for agreed actions: specific, measurable, accurate, relevant and timely)
Actions:
(Keep on track)
The coach helps the coachee develop a review plan to return to check that they are on course
Review:
The Actions step is particularly important, as not taking action is a primary reason why outcomes are not achieved. Many researchers have found that self-efficacy (belief in being able to do what is needed to perform a given task/behave in a required way) has a powerful effect on both the level of difficulty of actions chosen and commitment to achieving them (Locke and Latham, 2012). Edwin Locke and Gary Latham’s Goal Setting Theory demonstrates that agreed actions need to be specific, achievable and stretching, whilst able to be embarked on immediately, and there also needs to be the right support in place (e.g., management agreement, training courses, mentoring).
If an action plan is too far from the coachee’s current knowledge, skills or situation, then they may become discouraged and demotivated. Moreover, when designing actions, a crucial aspect is that coachee has the responsibility for carrying these out.
Therefore, the coach can make a difference by helping coachees recognise their responsibility and take ownership of the actions needed to achieve the desired outcome.
This is another imperative stage, where having separate points for measuring the progress of each agreed action can facilitate the achievement of the overall goal.
Review meetings are more successful if they occur on a regular basis, perhaps around deadlines for specific actions, to ensure the coachee is on track and offer further support. Feedback at this stage, which gives a clear and positive indication of achievement, can provide motivation and encouragement.
If actions have not been achieved, then both the short- and long-term goals could be re-assessed using the OSCAR process once more, remembering that performance is affected not only by the actions undertaken, but also by confidence in being able to do it (i.e., self-efficacy).
However, if the coachee continues to find actions and change difficult, it may be more helpful to assign them a mentor. They would then share knowledge, skills and experience to aid coachee to progress. However, mentoring is much more than ‘giving advice’: it’s about motivating and empowering the other person to find ways of resolving own issues and reaching own goals. And not doing it for them or expecting them to do it ‘the mentor’s way’, but by understanding and respecting diverse ways of working. Therefore, the choice of mentor is an important one!
There is a lot to consider in this article, and it may be of benefit to discuss the ideas here with a trusted colleague, or ask for coaching in these areas yourself.
If you’d like to discuss coaching with Danny, you can contact him via the website.
“Firgun”, “#HappyBeesMakeTastyHoney” and the hexagon device are registered trademarks of Firgun Ltd.
Registered in England and Wales: 13907991. Copyright 2025 | Firgun Ltd – All rights reserved.